Kyūdō
The Business Case

The financial case for governed assurance.

Three categories of cost reduction. One pricing tier that pays for itself within the first audit cycle.

01

Audit cost reduction

Status quo

Mid-market organizations running 2 to 4 frameworks typically spend $80K to $250K annually on external consultants for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and CMMC readiness work.

With Kyudo

Continuous evidence collection eliminates 60 to 80 percent of that consultant spend. The Regulated tier at $45K replaces one to three consultant engagements.

02

Compliance headcount avoided

Status quo

Adding a fourth framework typically requires a half-FTE GRC analyst, roughly $60K in fully loaded annual cost.

With Kyudo

One control library serves every framework. Headcount stays flat as framework count grows.

03

Deal velocity recovered

Status quo

Enterprise security reviews block deals for 4 to 8 weeks. ARR slips a quarter when reviews push close dates.

With Kyudo

Trust Center reduces customer security reviews from weeks to hours. Self-service evidence packages answer 80 percent of questionnaire items without sales engineering involvement.

Cost Comparison

Your current compliance cost vs. Kyudo.

Comparison ranges sourced from publicly available pricing and industry benchmarks. Your results will vary by framework count and team size.

AlternativeAnnual costTradeoff
Big-4 SOC 2 + ISO 27001 prep$80K–$150K/yrTime-bounded, no continuous coverage
GRC (SaaS) Platforms$60K–$90K/yrMulti-tenant SaaS, your data leaves your tenant
In-house GRC analyst (1 FTE)$90K–$140K/yrHeadcount scales linearly with framework count
Kyudo Regulated tier$45K/yrCustomer-hosted Azure. Up to 4 frameworks. Continuous.
See the ROI comparison